TY - JOUR
T1 - Gradual Titration of Semaglutide Results in Better Treatment Adherence and Fewer Adverse Events
T2 - A Randomized Controlled Open-Label Pilot Study Examining a 16-Week Flexible Titration Regimen Versus Label-Recommended 8-Week Semaglutide Titration Regimen
AU - Eldor, Roy
AU - Avraham, Noa
AU - Rosenberg, Orit
AU - Shpigelman, Miriam
AU - Golan-Cohen, Avivit
AU - Cukierman-Yaffe, Tali
AU - Merzon, Eugene
AU - Buch, Assaf
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025, American Diabetes Association Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/9
Y1 - 2025/9
N2 - OBJECTIVE To determine whether a slower, flexible titration regimen of semaglutide would improve adherence and reduce gastrointestinal adverse events (GI-AEs) compared with the label-recommended regimen in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 104 patients with T2D were randomized to label-recommended titration (0.25 mg, 0.5 mg, 1 mg at 4-week intervals) or flexible titration (starting at 0.0675 mg [measured as five clicks made by the dose selector dial], with gradual increases by 0.0675 mg/week and delays for GI-AEs) for 26 weeks. RESULTS While final doses were similar between groups, only 2% of patients in the flexible arm withdrew due to GI-AEs vs. 19% in the label arm (P = 0.005). The flexible arm reported less nausea (45.1% vs. 64.2%; P = 0.051) and asthenia (9.8% vs. 24.5%; P = 0.047), with fewer days experiencing nausea (2.88 vs. 6.3 days; P = 0.017). HbA1c and BMI changes were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS Slower, flexible titration improved adherence and reduced adverse events without compromising efficacy.
AB - OBJECTIVE To determine whether a slower, flexible titration regimen of semaglutide would improve adherence and reduce gastrointestinal adverse events (GI-AEs) compared with the label-recommended regimen in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 104 patients with T2D were randomized to label-recommended titration (0.25 mg, 0.5 mg, 1 mg at 4-week intervals) or flexible titration (starting at 0.0675 mg [measured as five clicks made by the dose selector dial], with gradual increases by 0.0675 mg/week and delays for GI-AEs) for 26 weeks. RESULTS While final doses were similar between groups, only 2% of patients in the flexible arm withdrew due to GI-AEs vs. 19% in the label arm (P = 0.005). The flexible arm reported less nausea (45.1% vs. 64.2%; P = 0.051) and asthenia (9.8% vs. 24.5%; P = 0.047), with fewer days experiencing nausea (2.88 vs. 6.3 days; P = 0.017). HbA1c and BMI changes were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS Slower, flexible titration improved adherence and reduced adverse events without compromising efficacy.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105013871919
U2 - 10.2337/dc25-0690
DO - 10.2337/dc25-0690
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 40673973
AN - SCOPUS:105013871919
SN - 0149-5992
VL - 48
SP - 1607
EP - 1611
JO - Diabetes Care
JF - Diabetes Care
IS - 9
ER -