Generational association studies of dopaminergic genes in reward deficiency syndrome (RDS) subjects: Selecting appropriate phenotypes for reward dependence behaviors

  • Kenneth Blum
  • , Amanda L.C. Chen
  • , Marlene Oscar-Berman
  • , Thomas J.H. Chen
  • , Joel Lubar
  • , Nancy White
  • , Judith Lubar
  • , Abdalla Bowirrat
  • , Eric Braverman
  • , John Schoolfield
  • , Roger L. Waite
  • , Bernard W. Downs
  • , Margaret Madigan
  • , David E. Comings
  • , Caroline Davis
  • , Mallory M. Kerner
  • , Jennifer Knopf
  • , Tomas Palomo
  • , John J. Giordano
  • , Siobhan A. Morse
  • Frank Fornari, Debmalya Barh, John Femino, John A. Bailey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

46 Scopus citations

Abstract

Abnormal behaviors involving dopaminergic gene polymorphisms often reflect an insufficiency of usual feelings of satisfaction, or Reward Deficiency Syndrome (RDS). RDS results from a dysfunction in the brain reward cascade, a complex interaction among neurotransmitters (primarily dopaminergic and opioidergic). Individuals with a family history of alcoholism or other addictions may be born with a deficiency in the ability to produce or use these neurotransmitters. Exposure to prolonged periods of stress and alcohol or other substances also can lead to a corruption of the brain reward cascade function. We evaluated the potential association of four variants of dopaminergic candidate genes in RDS (dopamine D1 receptor gene [DRD1]; dopamine D2 receptor gene [DRD2]; dopamine transporter gene [DAT1]; dopamine beta-hydroxylase gene [DBH]). Methodology: We genotyped an experimental group of 55 subjects derived from up to five generations of two independent multiple-affected families compared to rigorously screened control subjects (e.g., N = 30 super controls for DRD2 gene polymorphisms). Data related to RDS behaviors were collected on these subjects plus 13 deceased family members. Results: Among the genotyped family members, the DRD2 Taq1 and the DAT1 10/10 alleles were significantly (at least p < 0.015) more often found in the RDS families vs. controls. The TaqA1 allele occurred in 100% of Family A individuals (N = 32) and 47.8% of Family B subjects (11 of 23). No significant differences were found between the experimental and control positive rates for the other variants. Conclusions: Although our sample size was limited, and linkage analysis is necessary, the results support the putative role of dopaminergic polymorphisms in RDS behaviors. This study shows the importance of a nonspecific RDS phenotype and informs an understanding of how evaluating single subset behaviors of RDS may lead to spurious results. Utilization of a nonspecific reward phenotype may be a paradigm shift in future association and linkage studies involving dopaminergic polymorphisms and other neurotransmitter gene candidates.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4425-4459
Number of pages35
JournalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Volume8
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Controls
  • Dopamine
  • Gene polymorphisms
  • Generational association studies
  • Phenotype
  • Reward deficiency syndrome (RDS)
  • Super normal

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Generational association studies of dopaminergic genes in reward deficiency syndrome (RDS) subjects: Selecting appropriate phenotypes for reward dependence behaviors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this