TY - JOUR
T1 - Gender, status and the use of power strategies
AU - Keshet, Shira
AU - Kark, Ronit
AU - Pomerantz-Zorin, Limor
AU - Koslowsky, Meni
AU - Schwarzwald, Joseph
PY - 2006/1
Y1 - 2006/1
N2 - The present study examined the effects of gender and status on the use of power strategies. The experiment consisted of a computer-based problem-solving task performed in pairs, where participants interacted with simulated long-distance partners. Participants were 36 female and 38 male undergraduate students, who were assigned to be influencing agents and were required to convince their partners to accept their help in the problem-solving process. Status was manipulated by the extent to which partners were dependent upon the participants' resources. Partners were either same sex or other sex. Results indicated an interactive effect of agent gender by status. Men used more frequently 'masculine'-typed and less frequently 'feminine'-typed strategies than did women in low status positions, whereas in high status positions no significant gender differences in power strategy choices were found. These findings suggest that gender differences and similarities vary according to social contexts. Implications of the findings for both theory and practice are discussed.
AB - The present study examined the effects of gender and status on the use of power strategies. The experiment consisted of a computer-based problem-solving task performed in pairs, where participants interacted with simulated long-distance partners. Participants were 36 female and 38 male undergraduate students, who were assigned to be influencing agents and were required to convince their partners to accept their help in the problem-solving process. Status was manipulated by the extent to which partners were dependent upon the participants' resources. Partners were either same sex or other sex. Results indicated an interactive effect of agent gender by status. Men used more frequently 'masculine'-typed and less frequently 'feminine'-typed strategies than did women in low status positions, whereas in high status positions no significant gender differences in power strategy choices were found. These findings suggest that gender differences and similarities vary according to social contexts. Implications of the findings for both theory and practice are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=32244438552&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ejsp.287
DO - 10.1002/ejsp.287
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:32244438552
SN - 0046-2772
VL - 36
SP - 105
EP - 117
JO - European Journal of Social Psychology
JF - European Journal of Social Psychology
IS - 1
ER -