TY - GEN
T1 - Fs-Cx
T2 - 37th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, ICTAI 2025
AU - Nizri, Meir
AU - Azaria, Amos
AU - Hazon, Noam
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 IEEE.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Recommender systems are widely used and are present in various applications, including movie recommendations, product sales, and content providers. However, current recommender systems are usually black-box and lack the ability to explain their decisions or allow users to question them. In this paper, we develop an automatic method that, given a contrastive query from the user, generates contrastive explanations based on items' features and users' preferences (provided as ratings). That is, once receiving a recommendation, the users have the option to ask the system why it did not recommend a specific different item. Our method enables a recommender system to reply with a meaningful and convincing personalized explanation. For example, the recommender system may recommend the user to buy a Samsung S22 phone. The user may ask the system why it did not recommend the Xiaomi 12. Based on the user's preferences, all other users' preferences, and the specific phones in question, our method might infer that a good camera is particularly important to the user, and thus, say that the Samsung S22 includes a better camera than the Xiaomi 12. We compose a new dataset based on user ratings of the most popular cell phones in the US in 2022. Based on this dataset, we run an experiment with 100 human participants who are recommended an item and shown contrastive explanations generated by our method, as well as two additional baseline methods. We show that humans are more convinced that the recommended item is better than the contrastive item when using our contrastive explanations.
AB - Recommender systems are widely used and are present in various applications, including movie recommendations, product sales, and content providers. However, current recommender systems are usually black-box and lack the ability to explain their decisions or allow users to question them. In this paper, we develop an automatic method that, given a contrastive query from the user, generates contrastive explanations based on items' features and users' preferences (provided as ratings). That is, once receiving a recommendation, the users have the option to ask the system why it did not recommend a specific different item. Our method enables a recommender system to reply with a meaningful and convincing personalized explanation. For example, the recommender system may recommend the user to buy a Samsung S22 phone. The user may ask the system why it did not recommend the Xiaomi 12. Based on the user's preferences, all other users' preferences, and the specific phones in question, our method might infer that a good camera is particularly important to the user, and thus, say that the Samsung S22 includes a better camera than the Xiaomi 12. We compose a new dataset based on user ratings of the most popular cell phones in the US in 2022. Based on this dataset, we run an experiment with 100 human participants who are recommended an item and shown contrastive explanations generated by our method, as well as two additional baseline methods. We show that humans are more convinced that the recommended item is better than the contrastive item when using our contrastive explanations.
KW - Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
KW - Recommender Systems
KW - User Trust and Transparency
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105031881963
U2 - 10.1109/ICTAI66417.2025.00031
DO - 10.1109/ICTAI66417.2025.00031
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontobookanthology.conference???
AN - SCOPUS:105031881963
T3 - Proceedings - International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, ICTAI
SP - 181
EP - 186
BT - Proceedings - 2025 IEEE 37th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, ICTAI 2025
PB - IEEE Computer Society
Y2 - 3 November 2025 through 5 November 2025
ER -