TY - JOUR
T1 - Fever survey highlights significant variations in how infants aged ≤60 days are evaluated and underline the need for guidelines
AU - Yarden-Bilavsky, Havatzelet
AU - Ashkenazi, Shai
AU - Amir, Jacob
AU - Schlesinger, Yechiel
AU - Bilavsky, Efraim
PY - 2014/4
Y1 - 2014/4
N2 - Aim To assess the common practices for evaluating and treating febrile infants aged ≤60 days in a nationwide survey. Methods Questionnaires were administrated to inpatient paediatric departments in all 25 hospitals in Israel. Results Of the 25 centres surveyed (100% response rate), only 36% had written protocols concerning the approach to young febrile infants. The existence of a written protocol was significantly associated with the level of medical centre (tertiary versus primary and secondary, p = 0.041) and with the number of local paediatric infectious disease specialists (p = 0.034). In 13 (52%) hospitals, a normal white blood cell count was defined as 5000-15 000 cells/mL and 20 (80%) centres use C-reactive protein. Hospitalisation was mandatory in most (96%) centres for all neonates aged ≤28 days. Low-risk infants aged 29-60 days were hospitalised in 68.4% of the primary and secondary hospitals, compared with 33.3% tertiary centres. Ampicillin and gentamicin was the routine empiric antibiotic treatment for febrile infant in 92% of centres. Conclusion Significant differences exist among centres in the evaluation of febrile infants aged ≤60 days exist. These differences reflect the lack of, and highlight the need for, national or international guidelines for the evaluation of fever in this age group.
AB - Aim To assess the common practices for evaluating and treating febrile infants aged ≤60 days in a nationwide survey. Methods Questionnaires were administrated to inpatient paediatric departments in all 25 hospitals in Israel. Results Of the 25 centres surveyed (100% response rate), only 36% had written protocols concerning the approach to young febrile infants. The existence of a written protocol was significantly associated with the level of medical centre (tertiary versus primary and secondary, p = 0.041) and with the number of local paediatric infectious disease specialists (p = 0.034). In 13 (52%) hospitals, a normal white blood cell count was defined as 5000-15 000 cells/mL and 20 (80%) centres use C-reactive protein. Hospitalisation was mandatory in most (96%) centres for all neonates aged ≤28 days. Low-risk infants aged 29-60 days were hospitalised in 68.4% of the primary and secondary hospitals, compared with 33.3% tertiary centres. Ampicillin and gentamicin was the routine empiric antibiotic treatment for febrile infant in 92% of centres. Conclusion Significant differences exist among centres in the evaluation of febrile infants aged ≤60 days exist. These differences reflect the lack of, and highlight the need for, national or international guidelines for the evaluation of fever in this age group.
KW - Bacteremia
KW - National survey
KW - Neonatal fever
KW - Rochester criteria
KW - Sepsis work-up
KW - Serious bacterial infection
KW - Urinary tract infection
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896137587&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/apa.12560
DO - 10.1111/apa.12560
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 24446962
AN - SCOPUS:84896137587
SN - 0803-5253
VL - 103
SP - 379
EP - 385
JO - Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics
JF - Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics
IS - 4
ER -