Evaluating nutritional and food cost assessments: Cash-register receipts may be an alternative for FFQs-Accuracy and feasibility in a dietary study

Idan Hollander, Kerem Avital, Uri Goldbourt, Assaf Buch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective Comparing two dietary cost measurements at the individual level: 'Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) and supermarkets prices' with 'cash-register-receipts-items'. Design Method comparison study. Reference method: participants collected receipts of food purchases for 28 days; conventional method: participants completed a diet-specific online FFQ. Setting A Vegan Israeli Study substudy. Participants 30 participants were recruited using advertisements on social media. Main outcome measure Average diet cost, energy and nutrients consumption, generated by: (1) items on receipts; (2) online FFQ with supermarkets prices. Analysis Examining correlations between methods and generating Bland-Altman graphs. Results Agreement between measurement tools increased when 'eating-away-from-home' dietary costs were omitted from the analysis, from differences of 1453 New Israeli Shekel (NIS)/28 days (414 US$/28 days) higher to 1010 NIS/28-days (288 US$/28days) lower compared with differences of 756 NIS/28 days (215 US$/28 days) higher to 1159 NIS/28 days (330 US$/28 days) lower. Moreover, the Pearson correlation between methods, which was r=0.29 (p=0.13), increased to r=0.52 (p<0.0042). Finally, Pearson correlations between questionnaire-based and receipt-based nutrients were: energy=0.58 (p=0.001); protein=0.46 (p=0.012); fat=0.50 (p=0.005); carbohydrates=0.76 (p<0.001); calcium=0.46 (p=0.012); and iron=0.37 (p=0.049). Conclusions and implications The dietary cost of the 'FFQ-and-supermarket-prices' method is more strongly correlated and agreeable with the 'cash-register-receipts-items' method when 'eating-away-from-home' items are omitted, indicating that 'eating-away-from-home' costs are poorly estimated when using the standard 'FFQ-and-supermarket-prices' method. Finally, estimating energy, carbohydrates, protein, fat, calcium and iron using 'cash-register-receipts-items' is feasible.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)49-56
Number of pages8
JournalBMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2025

Keywords

  • Dietary patterns
  • Nutrition assessment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating nutritional and food cost assessments: Cash-register receipts may be an alternative for FFQs-Accuracy and feasibility in a dietary study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this