TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating nutritional and food cost assessments
T2 - Cash-register receipts may be an alternative for FFQs-Accuracy and feasibility in a dietary study
AU - Hollander, Idan
AU - Avital, Kerem
AU - Goldbourt, Uri
AU - Buch, Assaf
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/6/1
Y1 - 2025/6/1
N2 - Objective Comparing two dietary cost measurements at the individual level: 'Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) and supermarkets prices' with 'cash-register-receipts-items'. Design Method comparison study. Reference method: participants collected receipts of food purchases for 28 days; conventional method: participants completed a diet-specific online FFQ. Setting A Vegan Israeli Study substudy. Participants 30 participants were recruited using advertisements on social media. Main outcome measure Average diet cost, energy and nutrients consumption, generated by: (1) items on receipts; (2) online FFQ with supermarkets prices. Analysis Examining correlations between methods and generating Bland-Altman graphs. Results Agreement between measurement tools increased when 'eating-away-from-home' dietary costs were omitted from the analysis, from differences of 1453 New Israeli Shekel (NIS)/28 days (414 US$/28 days) higher to 1010 NIS/28-days (288 US$/28days) lower compared with differences of 756 NIS/28 days (215 US$/28 days) higher to 1159 NIS/28 days (330 US$/28 days) lower. Moreover, the Pearson correlation between methods, which was r=0.29 (p=0.13), increased to r=0.52 (p<0.0042). Finally, Pearson correlations between questionnaire-based and receipt-based nutrients were: energy=0.58 (p=0.001); protein=0.46 (p=0.012); fat=0.50 (p=0.005); carbohydrates=0.76 (p<0.001); calcium=0.46 (p=0.012); and iron=0.37 (p=0.049). Conclusions and implications The dietary cost of the 'FFQ-and-supermarket-prices' method is more strongly correlated and agreeable with the 'cash-register-receipts-items' method when 'eating-away-from-home' items are omitted, indicating that 'eating-away-from-home' costs are poorly estimated when using the standard 'FFQ-and-supermarket-prices' method. Finally, estimating energy, carbohydrates, protein, fat, calcium and iron using 'cash-register-receipts-items' is feasible.
AB - Objective Comparing two dietary cost measurements at the individual level: 'Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) and supermarkets prices' with 'cash-register-receipts-items'. Design Method comparison study. Reference method: participants collected receipts of food purchases for 28 days; conventional method: participants completed a diet-specific online FFQ. Setting A Vegan Israeli Study substudy. Participants 30 participants were recruited using advertisements on social media. Main outcome measure Average diet cost, energy and nutrients consumption, generated by: (1) items on receipts; (2) online FFQ with supermarkets prices. Analysis Examining correlations between methods and generating Bland-Altman graphs. Results Agreement between measurement tools increased when 'eating-away-from-home' dietary costs were omitted from the analysis, from differences of 1453 New Israeli Shekel (NIS)/28 days (414 US$/28 days) higher to 1010 NIS/28-days (288 US$/28days) lower compared with differences of 756 NIS/28 days (215 US$/28 days) higher to 1159 NIS/28 days (330 US$/28 days) lower. Moreover, the Pearson correlation between methods, which was r=0.29 (p=0.13), increased to r=0.52 (p<0.0042). Finally, Pearson correlations between questionnaire-based and receipt-based nutrients were: energy=0.58 (p=0.001); protein=0.46 (p=0.012); fat=0.50 (p=0.005); carbohydrates=0.76 (p<0.001); calcium=0.46 (p=0.012); and iron=0.37 (p=0.049). Conclusions and implications The dietary cost of the 'FFQ-and-supermarket-prices' method is more strongly correlated and agreeable with the 'cash-register-receipts-items' method when 'eating-away-from-home' items are omitted, indicating that 'eating-away-from-home' costs are poorly estimated when using the standard 'FFQ-and-supermarket-prices' method. Finally, estimating energy, carbohydrates, protein, fat, calcium and iron using 'cash-register-receipts-items' is feasible.
KW - Dietary patterns
KW - Nutrition assessment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105006639955&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjnph-2024-001145
DO - 10.1136/bmjnph-2024-001145
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:105006639955
SN - 2516-5542
VL - 8
SP - 49
EP - 56
JO - BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health
JF - BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health
IS - 1
ER -