TY - JOUR
T1 - Ethics of drug studies in infants
T2 - How many samples are required for accurate estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters in neonates?
AU - Long, David
AU - Koren, Gideon
AU - James, Andrew
PY - 1987/12
Y1 - 1987/12
N2 - Our study aimed to determine the least number of samples that are required toobtain accurate pharmacokinetic parameters in neonates. Patients freated with either netilmicin or ceftazidime had between five and eight samples drawn for drug concentration measurement after the first or the last dose of the drug. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using all the avallable points as a reference and then recalculated with 2, 3, or 4 points. Systemic clearance and volume of distribution were significantly different from the reference value when 2 points were used for netilmicin after the first dose and ceftazidime after the last dose. Had parameters obtained from 2 points been used, mean dosage would have been underestimated by 15% for ceftazidime and 11% for netilmicin, and some patients would have received only 65% of the dose calculated from all available points. When 3 points were used, dosage would have been underestimated by a mean of only 1% for ceftazidime and 5% for netilmicin when compared with the dosage estimated from the reference parameters. We conclude that 3 concentration time points may be all that are required for estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters sufficiently accurate for practical purposes in neonates.
AB - Our study aimed to determine the least number of samples that are required toobtain accurate pharmacokinetic parameters in neonates. Patients freated with either netilmicin or ceftazidime had between five and eight samples drawn for drug concentration measurement after the first or the last dose of the drug. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using all the avallable points as a reference and then recalculated with 2, 3, or 4 points. Systemic clearance and volume of distribution were significantly different from the reference value when 2 points were used for netilmicin after the first dose and ceftazidime after the last dose. Had parameters obtained from 2 points been used, mean dosage would have been underestimated by 15% for ceftazidime and 11% for netilmicin, and some patients would have received only 65% of the dose calculated from all available points. When 3 points were used, dosage would have been underestimated by a mean of only 1% for ceftazidime and 5% for netilmicin when compared with the dosage estimated from the reference parameters. We conclude that 3 concentration time points may be all that are required for estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters sufficiently accurate for practical purposes in neonates.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023600218&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0022-3476(87)80219-6
DO - 10.1016/S0022-3476(87)80219-6
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 3316566
AN - SCOPUS:0023600218
SN - 0022-3476
VL - 111
SP - 918
EP - 921
JO - Journal of Pediatrics
JF - Journal of Pediatrics
IS - 6 PART 1
ER -