TY - JOUR
T1 - Estimating the probability of meeting a deadline in schedules and plans
AU - Cohen, Liat
AU - Shimony, Solomon Eyal
AU - Weiss, Gera
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2019/10
Y1 - 2019/10
N2 - Given a plan (or schedule) with uncertain task times, we propose a deterministic polynomial (time and memory) algorithm for estimating the probability that it meets a deadline, or, equivalently, that its makespan is less than a given duration. Approximation is needed as it is known that this problem is NP-hard even for sequential plans (sum of random variables). In addition, we show two new complexity results: (1) Counting the number of events that do not cross the deadline is #P-hard; (2) Computing the expected makespan of a hierarchical plan is NP-hard. For the proposed approximation algorithm, we establish formal approximation bounds and show that the time and memory complexities grow polynomially with the required accuracy, the number of nodes in the plan, and with the size of the support of the random variables that represent the durations of the primitive tasks. We examine these approximation bounds empirically and demonstrate, using task networks taken from the literature, how our scheme outperforms sampling techniques and exact computation in terms of accuracy and run-time. As the empirical data shows much better error bounds than guaranteed, we also suggest a method for tightening the bounds in some cases.
AB - Given a plan (or schedule) with uncertain task times, we propose a deterministic polynomial (time and memory) algorithm for estimating the probability that it meets a deadline, or, equivalently, that its makespan is less than a given duration. Approximation is needed as it is known that this problem is NP-hard even for sequential plans (sum of random variables). In addition, we show two new complexity results: (1) Counting the number of events that do not cross the deadline is #P-hard; (2) Computing the expected makespan of a hierarchical plan is NP-hard. For the proposed approximation algorithm, we establish formal approximation bounds and show that the time and memory complexities grow polynomially with the required accuracy, the number of nodes in the plan, and with the size of the support of the random variables that represent the durations of the primitive tasks. We examine these approximation bounds empirically and demonstrate, using task networks taken from the literature, how our scheme outperforms sampling techniques and exact computation in terms of accuracy and run-time. As the empirical data shows much better error bounds than guaranteed, we also suggest a method for tightening the bounds in some cases.
KW - Approximation
KW - Deadline
KW - Makespan
KW - Plan
KW - Random variables
KW - Schedule
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068364434&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.artint.2019.06.009
DO - 10.1016/j.artint.2019.06.009
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85068364434
SN - 0004-3702
VL - 275
SP - 329
EP - 355
JO - Artificial Intelligence
JF - Artificial Intelligence
ER -