TY - JOUR
T1 - Establishing the Reliability of a Tool for Assessing Israeli Physical Therapy Students' Clinical Performance
AU - Schwartz, Donny
AU - Jacob, Tamar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2019 Academy of Physical Therapy Education, APTA.
PY - 2019/9/1
Y1 - 2019/9/1
N2 - Introduction. The evaluation of students' abilities in the clinical setting requires the use of a valid and reliable assessment tool. The assessment tool currently used for this purpose in all physical therapy (PT) undergraduate programs in Israel has never been evaluated for these parameters. This study aimed to find an established assessment tool, translate it into Hebrew, and determine the inter-rater reliability of the translated version and whether it could be a viable substitute for the currently used assessment tool. Review of the Literature. Revealed that the Assessment of Physiotherapy Practice (APP) is an established, valid, and reliable assessment tool. Subjects. Assessors: 21 clinical educators; assessed: 30 undergraduate PT students. Methods. The APP was translated into Hebrew using the translation.retranslation method. Clinical educators were briefly trained to use the APP before the study. Following 8 weeks of clinical practice in an assigned outpatient clinic, each student was assessed by 2 clinical educators, each of whomused both the APP and the currently used assessment tool. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to measure the inter-rater reliability of the APP. Cronbach's alpha was used to measure the internal consistency of the sections of the APP. Percentage of agreement between assessors was measured for each item. Results. The ICC for the total APP was 0.88 (95% confidence interval: 0.77.0.94). The internal consistency of APP sections ranged from 0.65 to 0.93 Cronbach's alpha. Exact agreement between assessors on 12 of the 20 items was identical in 63% or more occasions. Discussion and Conclusion. The ICC for the total score on the Hebrew APP was similar to that of the original APP, and the percentage of agreement among assessors was slightly lower than that of the original version. The latter may be due to the educators' limited experience with this assessment tool. The inter-rater reliability and validity of the Hebrew APP established it as a good substitute for the currently used assessment tool.
AB - Introduction. The evaluation of students' abilities in the clinical setting requires the use of a valid and reliable assessment tool. The assessment tool currently used for this purpose in all physical therapy (PT) undergraduate programs in Israel has never been evaluated for these parameters. This study aimed to find an established assessment tool, translate it into Hebrew, and determine the inter-rater reliability of the translated version and whether it could be a viable substitute for the currently used assessment tool. Review of the Literature. Revealed that the Assessment of Physiotherapy Practice (APP) is an established, valid, and reliable assessment tool. Subjects. Assessors: 21 clinical educators; assessed: 30 undergraduate PT students. Methods. The APP was translated into Hebrew using the translation.retranslation method. Clinical educators were briefly trained to use the APP before the study. Following 8 weeks of clinical practice in an assigned outpatient clinic, each student was assessed by 2 clinical educators, each of whomused both the APP and the currently used assessment tool. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to measure the inter-rater reliability of the APP. Cronbach's alpha was used to measure the internal consistency of the sections of the APP. Percentage of agreement between assessors was measured for each item. Results. The ICC for the total APP was 0.88 (95% confidence interval: 0.77.0.94). The internal consistency of APP sections ranged from 0.65 to 0.93 Cronbach's alpha. Exact agreement between assessors on 12 of the 20 items was identical in 63% or more occasions. Discussion and Conclusion. The ICC for the total score on the Hebrew APP was similar to that of the original APP, and the percentage of agreement among assessors was slightly lower than that of the original version. The latter may be due to the educators' limited experience with this assessment tool. The inter-rater reliability and validity of the Hebrew APP established it as a good substitute for the currently used assessment tool.
KW - APP
KW - Clinical assessment
KW - Clinical practice
KW - Physical therapy education
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85166004847&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/JTE.0000000000000093
DO - 10.1097/JTE.0000000000000093
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85166004847
SN - 0899-1855
VL - 33
SP - 243
EP - 248
JO - Journal of Physical Therapy Education
JF - Journal of Physical Therapy Education
IS - 3
ER -