Enhanced detection of feigned cognitive impairment using per item response time measurements in the Word Memory Test

T. Lupu, T. Elbaum, M. Wagner, Y. Braw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

Response time (RT) is a less obvious outcome measure than conventional accuracy measures used in performance validity tests (PVTs). It is also under less conscious control and is affected by cognitive processes associated with deception. Studies that assessed the utility of RT for the detection of feigned cognitive impairment are however numbered. Moreover, RT variability was not assessed in a clinically used PVT. In the current study, we assessed the utility of RT measures for the detection of feigned cognitive impairment in the Word Memory Test (WMT). Healthy participants (N = 90) were randomly assigned to a simulation or control condition and their per-item RTs were recorded while they performed the WMT’s immediate recognition (IR) subtest. Simulators had longer mean RTs and larger RT variance than controls. Combining RT measures and the IR-subtest’s accuracy score enabled a highly accurate detection of simulators. Moreover, the combined scale demonstrated incremental value (though slight) in predicting group membership beyond the use of the accuracy score as the sole PVT measure. The findings tentatively point toward the usefulness of RT measures to enhance the detection of feigned cognitive impairment. Further studies are needed, however, in order to explore the utility of these measures in clinical settings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)532-542
Number of pages11
JournalApplied neuropsychology. Adult
Volume25
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2 Nov 2018

Keywords

  • Malingering
  • Word Memory Test (WMT)
  • performance validity test (PVT)
  • response time
  • simulation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Enhanced detection of feigned cognitive impairment using per item response time measurements in the Word Memory Test'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this