TY - JOUR
T1 - Elotuzumab plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma
T2 - ELOQUENT-2 follow-up and post-hoc analyses on progression-free survival and tumour growth
AU - Dimopoulos, Meletios A.
AU - Lonial, Sagar
AU - White, Darrell
AU - Moreau, Philippe
AU - Palumbo, Antonio
AU - San-Miguel, Jesus
AU - Shpilberg, Ofer
AU - Anderson, Kenneth
AU - Grosicki, Sebastian
AU - Spicka, Ivan
AU - Walter-Croneck, Adam
AU - Magen, Hila
AU - Mateos, Maria Victoria
AU - Belch, Andrew
AU - Reece, Donna
AU - Beksac, Meral
AU - Bleickardt, Eric
AU - Poulart, Valerie
AU - Sheng, Jennifer
AU - Sy, Oumar
AU - Katz, Jessica
AU - Singhal, Anil
AU - Richardson, Paul
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2017/9
Y1 - 2017/9
N2 - The randomized phase III ELOQUENT-2 study (NCT01239797) evaluated the efficacy and safety of elotuzumab + lenalidomide/dexamethasone (ELd) versus lenalidomide/dexamethasone (Ld) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ELd reduced the risk of disease progression/death by 30% versus Ld (hazard ratio [HR] 0·70). Median time from diagnosis was 3·5 years. We present extended 3-year follow-up data. Endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and interim overall survival (OS). Exploratory post-hoc analyses included impact of time from diagnosis and prior lines of therapy on PFS, and serum M-protein dynamic modelling. ORR was 79% (ELd) and 66% (Ld) (P = 0·0002). ELd reduced the risk of disease progression/death by 27% versus Ld (HR 0·73; P = 0·0014). Interim OS demonstrated a trend in favour of ELd (P = 0·0257); 1-, 2- and 3-year rates with ELd versus Ld were: 91% versus 83%, 73% versus 69% and 60% versus 53%. In patients with ≥ median time from diagnosis and one prior therapy, ELd resulted in a 53% reduction in the risk of progression/death versus Ld (HR 0·47). Serum M-protein dynamic modelling showed slower tumour regrowth with ELd. Adverse events were comparable between arms. ELd provided a durable and clinically relevant improvement in efficacy, with minimal incremental toxicity.
AB - The randomized phase III ELOQUENT-2 study (NCT01239797) evaluated the efficacy and safety of elotuzumab + lenalidomide/dexamethasone (ELd) versus lenalidomide/dexamethasone (Ld) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ELd reduced the risk of disease progression/death by 30% versus Ld (hazard ratio [HR] 0·70). Median time from diagnosis was 3·5 years. We present extended 3-year follow-up data. Endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and interim overall survival (OS). Exploratory post-hoc analyses included impact of time from diagnosis and prior lines of therapy on PFS, and serum M-protein dynamic modelling. ORR was 79% (ELd) and 66% (Ld) (P = 0·0002). ELd reduced the risk of disease progression/death by 27% versus Ld (HR 0·73; P = 0·0014). Interim OS demonstrated a trend in favour of ELd (P = 0·0257); 1-, 2- and 3-year rates with ELd versus Ld were: 91% versus 83%, 73% versus 69% and 60% versus 53%. In patients with ≥ median time from diagnosis and one prior therapy, ELd resulted in a 53% reduction in the risk of progression/death versus Ld (HR 0·47). Serum M-protein dynamic modelling showed slower tumour regrowth with ELd. Adverse events were comparable between arms. ELd provided a durable and clinically relevant improvement in efficacy, with minimal incremental toxicity.
KW - elotuzumab
KW - monoclonal antibody
KW - multiple myeloma
KW - overall survival
KW - progression-free survival
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021841714&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/bjh.14787
DO - 10.1111/bjh.14787
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 28677826
AN - SCOPUS:85021841714
SN - 0007-1048
VL - 178
SP - 896
EP - 905
JO - British Journal of Haematology
JF - British Journal of Haematology
IS - 6
ER -