Abstract
Background: Medication errors, common in pediatric medicine, have the potential for serious morbidity and mortality. A common reason for this iatrogenia is miscalculation due to decimal point errors and erroneous computation. A previous study from the authors' institution showed that a subgroup of medical trainees commit 10-fold computational errors that are likely to be life-threatening in the pediatric population. For this subgroup especially, a mechanism needs to catch these errors before they reach the patient. Objective: To examine whether the medication error review process is working effectively in correcting drug errors. Setting: A tertiary pediatric hospital in Toronto, Ontario. Methods: Medication incident reports filed between October 1, 1994 and June 30, 1995 were reviewed for actual and potential (ie, intercepted) errors. Results: An average of 73 medication reports were filed each month; the majority were actual errors. Only 48% of these were reviewed by the appropriate staff physician. Nurses were responsible for 77% of these errors, pharmacists 12% and physicians 11%. The rates of appropriate review and remedial action for nurses and pharmacists were 76% and 87%, respectively. For physicians, it was significantly lower at 38% (P < 0.01). Conclusions: The medication error review process is not functioning effectively on either the initial staff review or remedication. These flaws may explain the lack of improvement in rates of medication errors.
Translated title of the contribution | Effectiveness of the medication error review process at a tertiary pediatric hospital |
---|---|
Original language | French |
Pages (from-to) | 75-78 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology |
Volume | 4 |
Issue number | 2 |
State | Published - 1997 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Medication error
- Pediatric hospital
- Review process