TY - JOUR
T1 - Doing–Being and Relationship–Solitude
T2 - A Proposed Model for a Balanced Life
AU - Littman-Ovadia, Hadassah
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer Nature B.V.
PY - 2019/8/15
Y1 - 2019/8/15
N2 - Scholars over the last several decades have theorized and presented research regarding the key components of a balanced adult life. However, attempts to integrate these components are rare. This paper offers a two-dimensional model for understanding and constructing a balanced adult life: doing–being and relationship–solitude. Thriving by active doing (mastery/accomplishment) and by relationships (collaboration/engagement in positive relationships) comprise two major elements within the common models of well-being (e.g., self-determination theory and the flourish/PERMA theoretical model). However, to live a balanced life, these two socially desirable modes of existence—doing and relationships—must be complemented by being and solitude, respectively, each commanding a markedly lower profile in the literature. The two dimensions are described, followed by a presentation of the four modes generated from these two dimensions: solitary doing, communal doing, solitary being, and communal being. The benefits of each mode are presented and implications of the proposed model are discussed.
AB - Scholars over the last several decades have theorized and presented research regarding the key components of a balanced adult life. However, attempts to integrate these components are rare. This paper offers a two-dimensional model for understanding and constructing a balanced adult life: doing–being and relationship–solitude. Thriving by active doing (mastery/accomplishment) and by relationships (collaboration/engagement in positive relationships) comprise two major elements within the common models of well-being (e.g., self-determination theory and the flourish/PERMA theoretical model). However, to live a balanced life, these two socially desirable modes of existence—doing and relationships—must be complemented by being and solitude, respectively, each commanding a markedly lower profile in the literature. The two dimensions are described, followed by a presentation of the four modes generated from these two dimensions: solitary doing, communal doing, solitary being, and communal being. The benefits of each mode are presented and implications of the proposed model are discussed.
KW - Doing and being
KW - Life balance
KW - Relationship and solitude
KW - Well-being
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051648904&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10902-018-0018-8
DO - 10.1007/s10902-018-0018-8
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.systematicreview???
AN - SCOPUS:85051648904
SN - 1389-4978
VL - 20
SP - 1953
EP - 1971
JO - Journal of Happiness Studies
JF - Journal of Happiness Studies
IS - 6
ER -