TY - JOUR
T1 - Does a colonoscopy after acute diverticulitis affect its management?
T2 - A single center experience
AU - Schmilovitz-Weiss, Hemda
AU - Yalunin, Evgen
AU - Boaz, Mona
AU - Sehayek-Shabbat, Vered
AU - Levin, Izhak
AU - Chervinski, Alexandra
AU - Atar, Eli
AU - Niv, Yaron
AU - Shirin, Haim
PY - 2012/4
Y1 - 2012/4
N2 - BACKGROUND/GOALS:: Clinical diagnosis of acute diverticulitis is currently confirmed by an abdominal computerized tomography (CT). Common practice has been to perform a colonoscopy after the event to exclude other diagnoses, mainly colon cancer. Our aim was to evaluate the yield of an early colonoscopy. METHODS:: Medical records of 220 patients hospitalized for acute diverticulitis between June 1, 2002 and September 1, 2009 were reviewed. Acute diverticulitis was diagnosed by clinical criteria and characteristic CT findings. Fifteen patients were excluded either because of questionable CT or hematochezia. Mean age was 61.8±14.3 years (61% females). Clinical parameters, laboratory results, imaging, endoscopic and histopathological reports, and long-term patients' outcome were analyzed. RESULTS:: One hundred patients (aged 61.8±13.3 y, 54.1% females), underwent an early (4 to 6 wk) colonoscopy after hospital discharge. There were no significant differences in patients' characteristics or survival between those with or without colonoscopy (4±1.9 vs. 4.2±2.1 y, P=0.62). No colonic malignancy was detected. However, in 32 patients (32%) at least 1 polyp was found. Only 1 was determined as an advanced adenoma. No new or different diagnosis was made after colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS:: Our results suggest that colonoscopy does not affect the management of patients with acute diverticulitis nor alter the outcome. The current practice of a routine colonoscopy after acute diverticulitis, diagnosed by typical clinical symptoms and CT needs to be reevaluated.
AB - BACKGROUND/GOALS:: Clinical diagnosis of acute diverticulitis is currently confirmed by an abdominal computerized tomography (CT). Common practice has been to perform a colonoscopy after the event to exclude other diagnoses, mainly colon cancer. Our aim was to evaluate the yield of an early colonoscopy. METHODS:: Medical records of 220 patients hospitalized for acute diverticulitis between June 1, 2002 and September 1, 2009 were reviewed. Acute diverticulitis was diagnosed by clinical criteria and characteristic CT findings. Fifteen patients were excluded either because of questionable CT or hematochezia. Mean age was 61.8±14.3 years (61% females). Clinical parameters, laboratory results, imaging, endoscopic and histopathological reports, and long-term patients' outcome were analyzed. RESULTS:: One hundred patients (aged 61.8±13.3 y, 54.1% females), underwent an early (4 to 6 wk) colonoscopy after hospital discharge. There were no significant differences in patients' characteristics or survival between those with or without colonoscopy (4±1.9 vs. 4.2±2.1 y, P=0.62). No colonic malignancy was detected. However, in 32 patients (32%) at least 1 polyp was found. Only 1 was determined as an advanced adenoma. No new or different diagnosis was made after colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS:: Our results suggest that colonoscopy does not affect the management of patients with acute diverticulitis nor alter the outcome. The current practice of a routine colonoscopy after acute diverticulitis, diagnosed by typical clinical symptoms and CT needs to be reevaluated.
KW - CT imaging
KW - acute diverticulitis
KW - colon polyps
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858862303&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31823a43a1
DO - 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31823a43a1
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 22186742
AN - SCOPUS:84858862303
SN - 0192-0790
VL - 46
SP - 317
EP - 320
JO - Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology
JF - Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology
IS - 4
ER -