TY - JOUR
T1 - Determination of in-situ engineering properties of soil using response surface methodology
AU - Rubinstein, D.
AU - Upadhyaya, S. K.
AU - Sime, M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements--The authors acknowledge with gratitude the financial support received from the Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. and the Bi-National (United States-Israel) Agricultural Research Development \[BARD\] agency for this project.
PY - 1994/3
Y1 - 1994/3
N2 - Since in-situ soils seldom behave like remolded laboratory soils or disturbed field samples, it is important to "identify" or "calibrate" the engineering properties of field soil by means of in-situ tests. A response surface methodology based on an orthogonal regression in the parameter space has been developed to "identify" engineering properties of any material based on in-situ tests. The proposed methodology worked very well (i.e. very little error) in the case of a two parameter hypo-elastic model for soil. When a complex six parameter constitutive model for the soil was used (i.e. nonlinear elastic behavior with extended Drucker-Prager failure criteria and associated flow rule), this back analysis technique worked reasonably well. Although, some parameters were identified with very little error, other parameters contained up to about 25% error. Occasionally, the technique did not converge to a reasonable solution. Inclusion of a third-order correction improved the accuracy of the technique considerably. The technique was not very sensitive to the presence of random normal noise.
AB - Since in-situ soils seldom behave like remolded laboratory soils or disturbed field samples, it is important to "identify" or "calibrate" the engineering properties of field soil by means of in-situ tests. A response surface methodology based on an orthogonal regression in the parameter space has been developed to "identify" engineering properties of any material based on in-situ tests. The proposed methodology worked very well (i.e. very little error) in the case of a two parameter hypo-elastic model for soil. When a complex six parameter constitutive model for the soil was used (i.e. nonlinear elastic behavior with extended Drucker-Prager failure criteria and associated flow rule), this back analysis technique worked reasonably well. Although, some parameters were identified with very little error, other parameters contained up to about 25% error. Occasionally, the technique did not converge to a reasonable solution. Inclusion of a third-order correction improved the accuracy of the technique considerably. The technique was not very sensitive to the presence of random normal noise.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028386559&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0022-4898(94)90008-6
DO - 10.1016/0022-4898(94)90008-6
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:0028386559
SN - 0022-4898
VL - 31
SP - 67
EP - 92
JO - Journal of Terramechanics
JF - Journal of Terramechanics
IS - 2
ER -