TY - JOUR
T1 - Design Guidelines for Multiloop Perturbative Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithms
AU - Kivimäki, Jyri
AU - Kolesnik, Sergei
AU - Sitbon, Moshe
AU - Suntio, Teuvo
AU - Kuperman, Alon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 IEEE.
PY - 2018/2
Y1 - 2018/2
N2 - Due to relatively good performance and simple implementation, fixed-step direct maximum power point tracking (MPPT) techniques such as perturb and observe and incremental conductance are the most popular algorithms aimed to maximize the energy yield of photovoltaic energy conversion systems. In order to optimize the MPPT process performance, two design parameters - perturbation frequency and perturbation step size - need to be set a priori , taking into account the properties of both interfacing power converter and photovoltaic generator. While perturbation frequency is limited by the combined energy conversion system settling time, perturbation step size must be high enough to differentiate system response from that caused by irradiation variation. Recent studies have provided explicit design guidelines for single-loop MPPT structures only, where the algorithm directly sets the interfacing converter duty cycle. It was shown that dynamic resistance of the photovoltaic generator, which is both operation point and environmental conditions dependent, significantly affects the combined energy conversion system settling time. On the other hand, no design guidelines were explicitly given for multiloop MPPT structures, where the algorithm sets the reference signal for photovoltaic generator (PVG) voltage and inner-voltage controller performs the regulation task. This paper introduces perturbation frequency and perturbation step size design guidelines for such systems. It is shown that while perturbation step size design is similar to that of single-loop structures, perturbation frequency design is quite different. It is revealed that once the inner-voltage loop is properly closed, the influence of PVG dynamic resistance on settling time (and thus on perturbation frequency design) is negligible. Experimental results are provided to verify the proposed guidelines validity.
AB - Due to relatively good performance and simple implementation, fixed-step direct maximum power point tracking (MPPT) techniques such as perturb and observe and incremental conductance are the most popular algorithms aimed to maximize the energy yield of photovoltaic energy conversion systems. In order to optimize the MPPT process performance, two design parameters - perturbation frequency and perturbation step size - need to be set a priori , taking into account the properties of both interfacing power converter and photovoltaic generator. While perturbation frequency is limited by the combined energy conversion system settling time, perturbation step size must be high enough to differentiate system response from that caused by irradiation variation. Recent studies have provided explicit design guidelines for single-loop MPPT structures only, where the algorithm directly sets the interfacing converter duty cycle. It was shown that dynamic resistance of the photovoltaic generator, which is both operation point and environmental conditions dependent, significantly affects the combined energy conversion system settling time. On the other hand, no design guidelines were explicitly given for multiloop MPPT structures, where the algorithm sets the reference signal for photovoltaic generator (PVG) voltage and inner-voltage controller performs the regulation task. This paper introduces perturbation frequency and perturbation step size design guidelines for such systems. It is shown that while perturbation step size design is similar to that of single-loop structures, perturbation frequency design is quite different. It is revealed that once the inner-voltage loop is properly closed, the influence of PVG dynamic resistance on settling time (and thus on perturbation frequency design) is negligible. Experimental results are provided to verify the proposed guidelines validity.
KW - Maximum power point tracking (MPPT)
KW - multiloop control structure
KW - perturbative algorithms
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034071109&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TPEL.2017.2683268
DO - 10.1109/TPEL.2017.2683268
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85034071109
SN - 0885-8993
VL - 33
SP - 1284
EP - 1293
JO - IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
JF - IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
IS - 2
M1 - 7879313
ER -