Abstract
In the original publication [1], there were duplications in Figure 6 as published. To eliminate this error, a repeated procedure for analyzing cross-sections of the same samples was performed. The corrected Figure 6 appears below. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 1989 |
| Journal | Materials |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - May 2025 |