Comparison between linear and nonlinear in-season training programs in freshman football players

Jay R. Hoffman, Michael Wendell, Joshua Cooper, Jie Kang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare linear (LT) with nonlinear (NL) in-season training programs in freshman football players during the course of 2 separate seasons. During the first year (n = 14, mean ± SD = 177.3 ± 4.8 cm, 88.0 ± 9.7 kg), the LT program was employed 2 days per week. In the second year (n = 14, 175.0 ± 7.1 cm, 94.2 ± 20.5 kg), a 2 days per week LT was used. Subjects were tested for maximal strength in the squat (1 repetition maximum [1RM]) and bench press (1RM) exercises. A significant improvement in 1RM squat was seen in LT, but not in NL. No significant improvement in 1RM bench press was seen in either group. A significant difference between LT and NL was observed in Δ1RM squat (13.8 ± 7.4 kg compared with 1.6 ± 2.6 kg, respectively). Results of this study suggest that LT may be more effective in eliciting strength gains than NL in freshman football players during an in-season training program.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)561-565
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2003
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Athletic performance
  • Periodized training
  • Resistance training

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison between linear and nonlinear in-season training programs in freshman football players'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this