TY - JOUR
T1 - Classifying Medulloblastoma Subgroups Based on Small, Clinically Achievable Gene Sets
AU - Gershanov, Sivan
AU - Madiwale, Shreyas
AU - Feinberg-Gorenshtein, Galina
AU - Vainer, Igor
AU - Nehushtan, Tamar
AU - Michowiz, Shalom
AU - Goldenberg-Cohen, Nitza
AU - Birger, Yehudit
AU - Toledano, Helen
AU - Salmon-Divon, Mali
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright © 2021 Gershanov, Madiwale, Feinberg-Gorenshtein, Vainer, Nehushtan, Michowiz, Goldenberg-Cohen, Birger, Toledano and Salmon-Divon.
PY - 2021/6/10
Y1 - 2021/6/10
N2 - As treatment protocols for medulloblastoma (MB) are becoming subgroup-specific, means for reliably distinguishing between its subgroups are a timely need. Currently available methods include immunohistochemical stains, which are subjective and often inconclusive, and molecular techniques—e.g., NanoString, microarrays, or DNA methylation assays—which are time-consuming, expensive and not widely available. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) provides a good alternative for these methods, but the current NanoString panel which includes 22 genes is impractical for qPCR. Here, we applied machine-learning–based classifiers to extract reliable, concise gene sets for distinguishing between the four MB subgroups, and we compared the accuracy of these gene sets to that of the known NanoString 22-gene set. We validated our results using an independent microarray-based dataset of 92 samples of all four subgroups. In addition, we performed a qPCR validation on a cohort of 18 patients diagnosed with SHH, Group 3 and Group 4 MB. We found that the 22-gene set can be reduced to only six genes (IMPG2, NPR3, KHDRBS2, RBM24, WIF1, and EMX2) without compromising accuracy. The identified gene set is sufficiently small to make a qPCR-based MB subgroup classification easily accessible to clinicians, even in developing, poorly equipped countries.
AB - As treatment protocols for medulloblastoma (MB) are becoming subgroup-specific, means for reliably distinguishing between its subgroups are a timely need. Currently available methods include immunohistochemical stains, which are subjective and often inconclusive, and molecular techniques—e.g., NanoString, microarrays, or DNA methylation assays—which are time-consuming, expensive and not widely available. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) provides a good alternative for these methods, but the current NanoString panel which includes 22 genes is impractical for qPCR. Here, we applied machine-learning–based classifiers to extract reliable, concise gene sets for distinguishing between the four MB subgroups, and we compared the accuracy of these gene sets to that of the known NanoString 22-gene set. We validated our results using an independent microarray-based dataset of 92 samples of all four subgroups. In addition, we performed a qPCR validation on a cohort of 18 patients diagnosed with SHH, Group 3 and Group 4 MB. We found that the 22-gene set can be reduced to only six genes (IMPG2, NPR3, KHDRBS2, RBM24, WIF1, and EMX2) without compromising accuracy. The identified gene set is sufficiently small to make a qPCR-based MB subgroup classification easily accessible to clinicians, even in developing, poorly equipped countries.
KW - biomarkers
KW - gene expression
KW - machine learning
KW - medulloblastoma
KW - subgroup classification
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118904809&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fonc.2021.637482
DO - 10.3389/fonc.2021.637482
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85118904809
SN - 2234-943X
VL - 11
JO - Frontiers in Oncology
JF - Frontiers in Oncology
M1 - 637482
ER -