TY - JOUR
T1 - Biomarkers
AU - Glik, Amir
AU - Arbiv, Omry
AU - Prado, Keshet
AU - Raphaeli, Orit
AU - Raclaw, Hayim
AU - Kait, Roy
AU - Kait, Ofri
AU - Goldstein, Anat
AU - Hajaj, Chen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Alzheimer's Association. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.
PY - 2025/12/1
Y1 - 2025/12/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: AD dementia risk prediction may help prevent 30% of cases by treating vascular risk factors years before clinical stage. Moreover, new disease modifying drugs are given only in the earliest clinical stages. Hence, there is a need for a tool that can flag high-risk cognitive healthy (CH) subjects in order to improve early drug accessibility. The tool should be able to screen mass populations in a short period while maintaining low cost. The aim of this study was to develop such a tool. METHOD: We interrogated a community cohort from the Clalit health care services. The cohort included 504,219 subjects, above the age of 45. Each subject had at least one routine blood count and basic chemistry and up to ten consecutive blood exams done on a yearly basis. The blood exams were done for various other reasons. After exclusion, there were 381,754 Cognitive Healthy (CH) subjects and 59,441 subjects diagnosed with AD (MCI or early dementia). AD Diagnosis was based on the 2011 NIA guidelines. The predictive ML tool was trained for different combinations of historical period (1 to 10y) and prediction horizons (1 to 10y). For each model, we calculated the accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), precision, recall, F1 score, false positive/negative rates, risk ratio (RR) and odds ratio (OR). RESULT: We present herein some examples of the model results. For one year of blood exam history (aka one blood exam) and one year of horizon prediction the accuracy was 0.73, AUC 0.8, precision 0.28, recall 0.73, F1 score 0.4. For two years of blood exam history and three years of horizon prediction the accuracy was 0.73, AUC 0.84, precision 0.28, recall 0.82, F1 score 0.42. For two years of history and ten years of horizon the accuracy was 0.73, AUC 0.81, precision 0.19, recall 0.75, F1 score 0.3. CONCLUSION: Routine Blood count and chemistry, done for various other reasons, may enclose information concerning future risk for AD dementia. Using ML and AI sophisticated tools can facilitate the use of routine blood exams as a screening tool for AD dementia risk assessment.
AB - BACKGROUND: AD dementia risk prediction may help prevent 30% of cases by treating vascular risk factors years before clinical stage. Moreover, new disease modifying drugs are given only in the earliest clinical stages. Hence, there is a need for a tool that can flag high-risk cognitive healthy (CH) subjects in order to improve early drug accessibility. The tool should be able to screen mass populations in a short period while maintaining low cost. The aim of this study was to develop such a tool. METHOD: We interrogated a community cohort from the Clalit health care services. The cohort included 504,219 subjects, above the age of 45. Each subject had at least one routine blood count and basic chemistry and up to ten consecutive blood exams done on a yearly basis. The blood exams were done for various other reasons. After exclusion, there were 381,754 Cognitive Healthy (CH) subjects and 59,441 subjects diagnosed with AD (MCI or early dementia). AD Diagnosis was based on the 2011 NIA guidelines. The predictive ML tool was trained for different combinations of historical period (1 to 10y) and prediction horizons (1 to 10y). For each model, we calculated the accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), precision, recall, F1 score, false positive/negative rates, risk ratio (RR) and odds ratio (OR). RESULT: We present herein some examples of the model results. For one year of blood exam history (aka one blood exam) and one year of horizon prediction the accuracy was 0.73, AUC 0.8, precision 0.28, recall 0.73, F1 score 0.4. For two years of blood exam history and three years of horizon prediction the accuracy was 0.73, AUC 0.84, precision 0.28, recall 0.82, F1 score 0.42. For two years of history and ten years of horizon the accuracy was 0.73, AUC 0.81, precision 0.19, recall 0.75, F1 score 0.3. CONCLUSION: Routine Blood count and chemistry, done for various other reasons, may enclose information concerning future risk for AD dementia. Using ML and AI sophisticated tools can facilitate the use of routine blood exams as a screening tool for AD dementia risk assessment.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105025834638
U2 - 10.1002/alz70856_102512
DO - 10.1002/alz70856_102512
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 41446993
AN - SCOPUS:105025834638
SN - 1552-5260
VL - 21
SP - e102512
JO - Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association
JF - Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association
ER -