Autodecremental pacing for the interruption of ventricular tachycardia and atrial flutter

Ron Waksman, Arthur Pollack, Barouch V. Berkovits, Hisham Nassar, Mervyn S. Gotsman, Yonathan Hasin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of autodecremental pacing (ADP) to interrupt ventricular tachycardia (VT) and atrial flutter was examined. Once tachycardia was recognized, ADP was initiated using a short train of stimuli with gradual shortening (3%) of the interstimulus interval. ADP was applied to 13 consecutive patients during 75 episodes of VT (mostly following induction by ventricular stimulation). Successful interruption of VT occurred in 88% of the episodes. In 6 episodes (8%), ADP resulted in ventricular fibrillation and in 3 episodes VT was unaffected by ADP. The only significant discriminator between the failure or success of ADP was the rate of VT. ADP was also applied to 17 consecutive patients with an atrial flutter that was resistant to conventional antiarrhythmic agents. Successful conversion of atrial flutter to sinus was seen in only 8 patients (47%). A temporary acceleration to atrial fibrillation appeared in 3 patients (18%), and in 6 patients atrial flutter was unaffected by ADP. ADP was successful in 70% ( 7 10) of patients with type 1 (<300 beats/min) atrial flutter. The authors conclude that ADP is beneficial in the interruption of VT and atrial flutter in a selected group of patients, especially with a slower rate of tachyarrhythmia (atrial rate during atrial flutter <300 beats/min and ventricular tachycardia <180 beats/min).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)339-344
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Electrocardiology
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1992
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • atrial flutter
  • autodecremental pacing
  • ventricular tachycardia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Autodecremental pacing for the interruption of ventricular tachycardia and atrial flutter'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this