Abstract
Party systems have been perceived for a long time as highly persistent, stable, “frozen” subsystems of the polity. This dominant view has been put forward most eloquently by Lipset and Rokkan (1976) and has been adopted and adapted by others since. This article challenges this view by studying 19 Western party systems over their entire history. I show that in terms of party systems fragmentation, ideological polarization, and instability of the vote, most systems cannot be regarded as stable. Party systems have not been “defreezing” in the last few years; they have never really been frozen.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 35-79 |
| Number of pages | 45 |
| Journal | Comparative Political Studies |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 1984 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Are Western Party Systems “Frozen”? A Comparative Dynamic Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver