TY - JOUR
T1 - Adolescent gender differences in internet safety education
AU - Steinfeld, Nili
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - The vast literature about adolescents’ online uses mentions a variety of gender differences regarding online habits, activities, and risks. But often these differences are not consistent, and result in contradicting trends in reported gender differences. This study adopts an information flux approach for distinguishing between perceptions of gender differences in uses and risks for adolescents online, and in emphasis of educational messages delivered by parents and teachers to adolescents. Based on a survey of adolescents, followed by interviews with Israeli adolescents, parents and teachers, the results indicate that indeed, boys are perceived as more vulnerable to risks resulting from exposure to (harmful) information, a perception consistent with a general perception of active masculinity attributing agency for boys, who actively and purposefully search and consume information from the network. Girls are perceived as vulnerable to risks resulting from exposure of (personal) information, a perception consistent with an image of femininity as giving, providing information to the network, and consequently being passively exposed to risk of predators. Consequently, educational messages and restrictions on boys and girls emphasize these differences and result in some aspects of risks, which research demonstrates both gefnders are vulnerable to, being neglected in parental mediation.
AB - The vast literature about adolescents’ online uses mentions a variety of gender differences regarding online habits, activities, and risks. But often these differences are not consistent, and result in contradicting trends in reported gender differences. This study adopts an information flux approach for distinguishing between perceptions of gender differences in uses and risks for adolescents online, and in emphasis of educational messages delivered by parents and teachers to adolescents. Based on a survey of adolescents, followed by interviews with Israeli adolescents, parents and teachers, the results indicate that indeed, boys are perceived as more vulnerable to risks resulting from exposure to (harmful) information, a perception consistent with a general perception of active masculinity attributing agency for boys, who actively and purposefully search and consume information from the network. Girls are perceived as vulnerable to risks resulting from exposure of (personal) information, a perception consistent with an image of femininity as giving, providing information to the network, and consequently being passively exposed to risk of predators. Consequently, educational messages and restrictions on boys and girls emphasize these differences and result in some aspects of risks, which research demonstrates both gefnders are vulnerable to, being neglected in parental mediation.
KW - Internet safety
KW - adolescents
KW - education
KW - gender
KW - information flux
KW - internet risks
KW - mixed methods
KW - privacy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122893239&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14680777.2022.2027494
DO - 10.1080/14680777.2022.2027494
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85122893239
SN - 1468-0777
VL - 23
SP - 1024
EP - 1041
JO - Feminist Media Studies
JF - Feminist Media Studies
IS - 3
ER -