TY - GEN
T1 - Active voltage sensorless supercapacitor bank balancer with peak current protection
AU - Yuhimenko, V.
AU - Geula, G.
AU - Agranovich, G.
AU - Averbukh, M.
AU - Kuperman, A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 IEEE.
PY - 2016/7/25
Y1 - 2016/7/25
N2 - In this paper, average modeling of a dual-supercapacitor bank, actively balanced by a bidirectional buck-boost converter is presented. In such a system, natural balancing is achieved when the converter is operated in open loop with 50% duty cycle, eliminating the need for measuring the voltage of each storage device. Nevertheless, excessive currents arise even for slight voltage misbalance because of the highly underdamped nature of the system. In order to remedy this drawback, bidirectional pulse-by-pulse inductor current limitation is introduced, which is equivalent to adding a peak-current-mode-like control loop to the system. Since the duty cycle never exceeds 50%, compensation ramp is not required to maintain stability. On the other hand, while the uncontrolled system dynamics is linear, introducing the current limit mechanism turns the closed loop dynamics into a nonlinear one, burdening the analysis task and thus calling for suitable average model to perform fast simulations for system analysis. Dynamical equations of the system are developed in order to derive the switching-cycle-averaged model. Simulations support the presented findings.
AB - In this paper, average modeling of a dual-supercapacitor bank, actively balanced by a bidirectional buck-boost converter is presented. In such a system, natural balancing is achieved when the converter is operated in open loop with 50% duty cycle, eliminating the need for measuring the voltage of each storage device. Nevertheless, excessive currents arise even for slight voltage misbalance because of the highly underdamped nature of the system. In order to remedy this drawback, bidirectional pulse-by-pulse inductor current limitation is introduced, which is equivalent to adding a peak-current-mode-like control loop to the system. Since the duty cycle never exceeds 50%, compensation ramp is not required to maintain stability. On the other hand, while the uncontrolled system dynamics is linear, introducing the current limit mechanism turns the closed loop dynamics into a nonlinear one, burdening the analysis task and thus calling for suitable average model to perform fast simulations for system analysis. Dynamical equations of the system are developed in order to derive the switching-cycle-averaged model. Simulations support the presented findings.
KW - active balancing
KW - buck-boost converter
KW - current limitation
KW - dynamic model
KW - supercapacitor bank
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983354433&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/IEPS.2016.7521855
DO - 10.1109/IEPS.2016.7521855
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontobookanthology.conference???
AN - SCOPUS:84983354433
T3 - 2016 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Energy and Power Systems, IEPS 2016 - Conference Proceedings
BT - 2016 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Energy and Power Systems, IEPS 2016 - Conference Proceedings
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Energy and Power Systems, IEPS 2016
Y2 - 7 June 2016 through 11 June 2016
ER -