A Remark on Schimmerling's Question

Ari Meir Brodsky, Assaf Rinot

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Schimmerling asked whether square(lambda)* + GCH entails the existence of a lambda(+)-Souslin tree, for a singular cardinal lambda. We provide an affirmative answer under the additional assumption that there exists a non-reflecting stationary subset of E-not equal cf(lambda)(lambda+). As a bonus, the outcome lambda(+)-Souslin tree is moreover free.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)525-561
Number of pages37
JournalOrder
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Microscopic approach
  • Parameterized proxy principle
  • Weak square
  • Postprocessing function
  • Non-reflecting stationary set
  • Free Souslin tree
  • Specializable Souslin tree
  • Complete tree
  • Ascending path

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Remark on Schimmerling's Question'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this