A Novel Switching Algorithm to the Preferred Clock Skew Estimator Applicable for the PTP Case in the Fractional Gaussian Noise Environment

Yehonatan Avraham, Monika Pinchas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Recently, the same authors provided a switching algorithm for the preferred clock skew estimator appropriate for the precision time protocol (PTP) scenario. The algorithm chooses the one-way delay (OWD) clock skew estimator for the Forward path or the Reverse path or the two-way delay (TWD) clock skew estimator that has the best performance in the mean square error (MSE) perspective. However, the switching algorithm applies only to the Gaussian scenario. In a real system, the packet delay variation (PDV) can be characterized as an fractional Gaussian noise (fGn) process where the Hurst exponent parameter can also have values higher than 0.5. Thus, the Gaussian case-switching algorithm may not apply in a real system where after a small set of PTP measurements, the switching algorithm should be able to switch effectively to the preferred clock skew estimator with the best performance in the MSE perspective. In this paper, the PDV is characterized as an fGn process where the Hurst exponent (H) is in the range of 0.5≤H<1. We estimate the unknown PDV variances and the Hurst exponent parameters of the Forward and Reverse paths. These estimated parameters are used for switching to the preferred clock skew estimator from the MSE perspective, even in the presence of asymmetry in the PDV or in the Hurst exponent parameters. We also detect and alarm for the unexpected load, cyber-attack, or clock skew deviation that can occur in a real system.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1695589
JournalMathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume2023
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Novel Switching Algorithm to the Preferred Clock Skew Estimator Applicable for the PTP Case in the Fractional Gaussian Noise Environment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this