A multicenter, prospective study of fetal outcome following accidental carbon monoxide poisoning in pregnancy

Gideon Koren, Teresa Sharav, Anne Pastuszak, Lorne K. Garrettson, Kelly Hill, Ivan Samson, Mark Rorem, Arlene King, Jill E. Dolgin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

94 Scopus citations

Abstract

We report the results of the first prospective, multicenter study of acute carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning in pregnancy. We collected and followed cases of CO poisoning occurring during pregnancy between December 1985 and March 1989. The sources of CO were malfunctioning furnaces (n = 16), hot water heaters (n = 7), car fumes (n = 6), and methylene chloride inhalation (n = 3). Pregnancy outcome was adversely affected in 3 of 5 pregnancies with severe toxicity; two stillbirths, and one cerebral palsy with tomographic findings consistent with ischemic damage. All adverse outcome occurred in cases treated with high flow oxygen, whereas the 2 cases of severe toxicity with normal outcomes followed hyperbaric oxygen therapy. All 31 babies exposed in utero to mild or moderate CO poisoning exhibited normal physical and neurobehavioral development. Severe maternal CO toxicity was associated with significantly more adverse fetal cases when compared to mild maternal toxicity (P < 0.001). It is concluded that while severe CO poisoning poses serious short- and long-term fetal risk, mild accidental exposure is likely to result in normal fetal outcome. Because fetal accumulation of CO is higher and its elimination slower than in the maternal circulation, hyperbaric oxygen may decrease fetal hypoxia and improve outcome.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)397-403
Number of pages7
JournalReproductive Toxicology
Volume5
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1991
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • carbon monoxide
  • fetus
  • poisoning
  • pregnancy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A multicenter, prospective study of fetal outcome following accidental carbon monoxide poisoning in pregnancy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this