TY - JOUR
T1 - A Comparison between the Wingate Anaerobic Power Test to Both Vertical Jump and Line Drill Tests in Basketball Players
AU - Hoffman, Jay R.
AU - Epstein, Shmuel
AU - Einbinder, Merav
AU - Weinstein, Yitzhak
PY - 2000/8
Y1 - 2000/8
N2 - The purpose of this study was to compare 2 sport-specific field tests common in the training programs of basketball players to a laboratory measure of anaerobic power. Nine 17-year-old members of the Israel National Youth Basketball Team participated in this investigation. Field tests included a countermovement jump (CMJ), a 15-second anaerobic jump test (APJT), and a sprint test to assess anaerobic power (line drill). The line drill was performed 3 times (T1, T2, and T3) with a 2-minute passive rest between each sprint. In addition, all subjects performed a 30-second Wingate anaerobic power test (WAnT) to determine peak power (PP), mean power (MP), and fatigue index (FIWAnT). Kendall tau (τ) rank correlation analysis revealed moderate positive rank correlations between MP and both T1 and T2 (τ = 0.61 and 0.54, respectively). No significant rank correlations were observed between PP and the line drill. Significant (p ≤ 0.05) positive rank correlations were noted between CMJ and both PP and MP (τ = 0.59 and 0.76, respectively). However, only a poor relationship (p > 0.05) was observed between APJT and both PP and MP (τ = 0.20 and 0.28, respectively). These results suggest that the line drill and jump tests may be acceptable field measures of anaerobic power specific for basketball players.
AB - The purpose of this study was to compare 2 sport-specific field tests common in the training programs of basketball players to a laboratory measure of anaerobic power. Nine 17-year-old members of the Israel National Youth Basketball Team participated in this investigation. Field tests included a countermovement jump (CMJ), a 15-second anaerobic jump test (APJT), and a sprint test to assess anaerobic power (line drill). The line drill was performed 3 times (T1, T2, and T3) with a 2-minute passive rest between each sprint. In addition, all subjects performed a 30-second Wingate anaerobic power test (WAnT) to determine peak power (PP), mean power (MP), and fatigue index (FIWAnT). Kendall tau (τ) rank correlation analysis revealed moderate positive rank correlations between MP and both T1 and T2 (τ = 0.61 and 0.54, respectively). No significant rank correlations were observed between PP and the line drill. Significant (p ≤ 0.05) positive rank correlations were noted between CMJ and both PP and MP (τ = 0.59 and 0.76, respectively). However, only a poor relationship (p > 0.05) was observed between APJT and both PP and MP (τ = 0.20 and 0.28, respectively). These results suggest that the line drill and jump tests may be acceptable field measures of anaerobic power specific for basketball players.
KW - Conditioning
KW - Elite athletes
KW - Field test
KW - Vertical jump
KW - Wingate test
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034394897&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1519/00124278-200008000-00004
DO - 10.1519/00124278-200008000-00004
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:0034394897
SN - 1064-8011
VL - 14
SP - 261
EP - 264
JO - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
JF - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
IS - 3
ER -