A Comparison between the Wingate Anaerobic Power Test to Both Vertical Jump and Line Drill Tests in Basketball Players

Jay R. Hoffman, Shmuel Epstein, Merav Einbinder, Yitzhak Weinstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

79 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare 2 sport-specific field tests common in the training programs of basketball players to a laboratory measure of anaerobic power. Nine 17-year-old members of the Israel National Youth Basketball Team participated in this investigation. Field tests included a countermovement jump (CMJ), a 15-second anaerobic jump test (APJT), and a sprint test to assess anaerobic power (line drill). The line drill was performed 3 times (T1, T2, and T3) with a 2-minute passive rest between each sprint. In addition, all subjects performed a 30-second Wingate anaerobic power test (WAnT) to determine peak power (PP), mean power (MP), and fatigue index (FIWAnT). Kendall tau (τ) rank correlation analysis revealed moderate positive rank correlations between MP and both T1 and T2 (τ = 0.61 and 0.54, respectively). No significant rank correlations were observed between PP and the line drill. Significant (p ≤ 0.05) positive rank correlations were noted between CMJ and both PP and MP (τ = 0.59 and 0.76, respectively). However, only a poor relationship (p > 0.05) was observed between APJT and both PP and MP (τ = 0.20 and 0.28, respectively). These results suggest that the line drill and jump tests may be acceptable field measures of anaerobic power specific for basketball players.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)261-264
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2000
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Conditioning
  • Elite athletes
  • Field test
  • Vertical jump
  • Wingate test

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Comparison between the Wingate Anaerobic Power Test to Both Vertical Jump and Line Drill Tests in Basketball Players'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this