ملخص
When committees make decisions, voting rules are coupled with one of three disclosure rules: open voting, in which each committee member’s individual vote is revealed; anonymous voting, in which only an anonymized tally is publicized; and secret voting, in which only the outcome is disclosed. I focus on strategic voters who have a preference for strategic ambiguity, and show that the amount of disclosure may have a non-monotonic effect on both the accuracy of the decision and the welfare of the voters. In particular, anonymous voting can yield both lower accuracy and higher welfare than both open and secret voting.
| اللغة الأصلية | الإنجليزيّة |
|---|---|
| الصفحات (من إلى) | 65-103 |
| عدد الصفحات | 39 |
| دورية | Economic Theory |
| مستوى الصوت | 66 |
| رقم الإصدار | 1 |
| المعرِّفات الرقمية للأشياء | |
| حالة النشر | نُشِر - يوليو 2018 |
| منشور خارجيًا | نعم |
بصمة
أدرس بدقة موضوعات البحث “Voting in the limelight'. فهما يشكلان معًا بصمة فريدة.قم بذكر هذا
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver