TY - JOUR
T1 - “The End Justifies the Fake”
T2 - Public Sense-Making of Deepfake Pro-Social Campaigns
AU - Steinfeld, Nili
AU - Lowenstein, Hila
AU - Rosenberg, Hananel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - Deepfake technology, often associated with deception and manipulation, is increasingly repurposed for pro-social purposes. Applying the Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) framework, this study examines audiences’ normative negotiation around Deepfake digital resurrection for social causes, through the Israeli campaign “Listen to My Voice.” Thematic analysis of six focus group discussions with 23 participants revealed intense emotional reactions and ethical reflections. Participants justified the campaign through perceived family consent, presumed victim approval, and life-saving potential, while advocating regulatory oversight and delineating acceptable use according to purpose, motive, and representational respect. Findings indicate context-sensitive moral reasoning rather than uniform acceptance or rejection of synthetic resurrection. Deepfake resurrection emerged as a symbolic act of witnessing, supporting prevention and commemoration when carefully produced and ethically governed. By examining audience sense-making of pro-social Deepfake resurrection campaigns, this study contributes to emerging debates on synthetic media ethics, affective engagement, and the governance of AI-mediated content.
AB - Deepfake technology, often associated with deception and manipulation, is increasingly repurposed for pro-social purposes. Applying the Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) framework, this study examines audiences’ normative negotiation around Deepfake digital resurrection for social causes, through the Israeli campaign “Listen to My Voice.” Thematic analysis of six focus group discussions with 23 participants revealed intense emotional reactions and ethical reflections. Participants justified the campaign through perceived family consent, presumed victim approval, and life-saving potential, while advocating regulatory oversight and delineating acceptable use according to purpose, motive, and representational respect. Findings indicate context-sensitive moral reasoning rather than uniform acceptance or rejection of synthetic resurrection. Deepfake resurrection emerged as a symbolic act of witnessing, supporting prevention and commemoration when carefully produced and ethically governed. By examining audience sense-making of pro-social Deepfake resurrection campaigns, this study contributes to emerging debates on synthetic media ethics, affective engagement, and the governance of AI-mediated content.
KW - Artificial intelligence
KW - deepfake
KW - intimate partner violence
KW - synthetic media
KW - technological acceptance
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105050372457
U2 - 10.1080/10447318.2026.2728938
DO - 10.1080/10447318.2026.2728938
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:105050372457
SN - 1044-7318
JO - International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
JF - International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
ER -