تخطي إلى التنقل الرئيسي تخطي إلى البحث تخطي إلى المحتوى الرئيسي

Proving Unsatisfiability with Hitting Formulas

نتاج البحث: فصل من :كتاب / تقرير / مؤتمرمنشور من مؤتمرمراجعة النظراء

2 اقتباسات (Scopus)

ملخص

A hitting formula is a set of Boolean clauses such that any two of the clauses cannot be simultaneously falsified. Hitting formulas have been studied in many different contexts at least since [45] and, based on experimental evidence, Peitl and Szeider [53] conjectured that unsatisfiable hitting formulas are among the hardest for resolution. Using the fact that hitting formulas are easy to check for satisfiability we make them the foundation of a new static proof system Hitting: A refutation of a CNF in Hitting is an unsatisfiable hitting formula such that each of its clauses is a weakening of a clause of the refuted CNF. Comparing this system to resolution and other proof systems is equivalent to studying the hardness of hitting formulas. Our first result is that Hitting is quasi-polynomially simulated by tree-like resolution, which means that hitting formulas cannot be exponentially hard for resolution and partially refutes the conjecture of Peitl and Szeider. We show that tree-like resolution and Hitting are quasipolynomially separated, while for resolution, this question remains open. For a system that is only quasi-polynomially stronger than tree-like resolution, Hitting is surprisingly difficult to polynomially simulate in another proof system. Using the ideas of Raz Shpilka s polynomial identity testing for noncommutative circuits [57] we show that Hitting is p-simulated by Extended Frege, but we conjecture that much more efficient simulations exist. As a byproduct, we show that a number of static (semi)algebraic systems are verifiable in deterministic polynomial time. We consider multiple extensions of Hitting, and in particular a proof system Hitting(⊕) related to the Res(⊕) proof system for which no superpolynomial-size lower bounds are known. Hitting(⊕) p-simulates the tree-like version of Res(⊕) and is at least quasi-polynomially stronger. We show that formulas expressing the non-existence of perfect matchings in the graphs Kn,n+2 are exponentially hard for Hitting(⊕) via a reduction to the partition bound for communication complexity.

اللغة الأصليةالإنجليزيّة
عنوان منشور المضيف15th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference, ITCS 2024
المحررونVenkatesan Guruswami
ناشرSchloss Dagstuhl- Leibniz-Zentrum fur Informatik GmbH, Dagstuhl Publishing
رقم المعيار الدولي للكتب (الإلكتروني)9783959773096
المعرِّفات الرقمية للأشياء
حالة النشرنُشِر - يناير 2024
الحدث15th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference, ITCS 2024 - Berkeley, الولايات المتّحدة
المدة: 30 يناير 20242 فبراير 2024

سلسلة المنشورات

الاسمLeibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, LIPIcs
مستوى الصوت287
رقم المعيار الدولي للدوريات (المطبوع)1868-8969

!!Conference

!!Conference15th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference, ITCS 2024
الدولة/الإقليمالولايات المتّحدة
المدينةBerkeley
المدة30/01/242/02/24

بصمة

أدرس بدقة موضوعات البحث “Proving Unsatisfiability with Hitting Formulas'. فهما يشكلان معًا بصمة فريدة.

قم بذكر هذا