TY - JOUR
T1 - Prehabilitation Reimagined as Policy
T2 - A Multidimensional Framework to Reduce Pain, Opioid Use, and Surgical Risk
AU - Lewandrowski, Kai Uwe
AU - Lorio, Morgan P.
AU - Elman, Igor
AU - Blum, Kenneth
AU - Pinhasov, Albert
AU - Thanos, Panayotis K.
AU - Schmidt, Sergio Luis
AU - Fiorelli, Rossano Kepler Alvim
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025, International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2025 ISASS. The IJSS is an open access journal following the Creative Commons Licensing Agreement CC BY-NC-ND. To learn more or order reprints, visit http://ijssurgery.com.
PY - 2025/12/1
Y1 - 2025/12/1
N2 - Background: Traditional surgical prehabilitation emphasizes biomechanical conditioning. In a pain landscape shaped by opioid exposure, trauma histories, and psychosocial distress, this reductionist approach is insufficient. Objective: To propose a multidimensional, whole-person framework for perioperative readiness that integrates neurobiological mechanisms with practical clinical and policy levers. Framework: Five synergistic domains—biological, psychological, social, spiritual, and existential—address discrete readiness deficits linked to dopaminergic tone, central sensitization, stress reactivity, connection, and meaning. Each domain is mapped to mechanisms, evidence-based interventions (eg, physical therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy/screening, social support linkage, chaplaincy, reflective practices), and relevant billing structures (Current Procedural Terminology Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System, International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision Z codes). Implementation: The model operationalizes a deliverables-based pathway—screen → triage → targeted interventions → outcome tracking—monitoring pain, function, opioid exposure (morphine milligram equivalents), length of stay/readmissions, depression and anxiety (Paitent Health Questionnaire-4), and pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale). It aligns with risk-adjusted payment models and can be embedded within enhanced recovery after surgery programs. Clinical Significance: Reframing prehabilitation as neurobiologically informed whole-person readiness provides a low-risk, nonpharmacological strategy to reduce suffering, improve engagement, enhance postoperative pain control and recovery, and decrease opioid reliance. Level of Evidence: 5 (Expert Opinion). This perspective integrates neurobiological and behavioral theory with policy and billing frameworks to enable hypothesis-generating implementation and outcomes research.
AB - Background: Traditional surgical prehabilitation emphasizes biomechanical conditioning. In a pain landscape shaped by opioid exposure, trauma histories, and psychosocial distress, this reductionist approach is insufficient. Objective: To propose a multidimensional, whole-person framework for perioperative readiness that integrates neurobiological mechanisms with practical clinical and policy levers. Framework: Five synergistic domains—biological, psychological, social, spiritual, and existential—address discrete readiness deficits linked to dopaminergic tone, central sensitization, stress reactivity, connection, and meaning. Each domain is mapped to mechanisms, evidence-based interventions (eg, physical therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy/screening, social support linkage, chaplaincy, reflective practices), and relevant billing structures (Current Procedural Terminology Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System, International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision Z codes). Implementation: The model operationalizes a deliverables-based pathway—screen → triage → targeted interventions → outcome tracking—monitoring pain, function, opioid exposure (morphine milligram equivalents), length of stay/readmissions, depression and anxiety (Paitent Health Questionnaire-4), and pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale). It aligns with risk-adjusted payment models and can be embedded within enhanced recovery after surgery programs. Clinical Significance: Reframing prehabilitation as neurobiologically informed whole-person readiness provides a low-risk, nonpharmacological strategy to reduce suffering, improve engagement, enhance postoperative pain control and recovery, and decrease opioid reliance. Level of Evidence: 5 (Expert Opinion). This perspective integrates neurobiological and behavioral theory with policy and billing frameworks to enable hypothesis-generating implementation and outcomes research.
KW - central sensitization
KW - dopamine neurobiology
KW - health behavior
KW - holistic health
KW - multimodal therapy
KW - neuroplasticity/physiology
KW - opioid use disorder
KW - pain management/methods
KW - preoperative care/methods
KW - psychosocial support systems
KW - spinal surgery/preoperative rehabilitation
KW - spirituality
KW - substance craving/prevention and control
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105042950866
U2 - 10.14444/8807
DO - 10.14444/8807
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:105042950866
SN - 2211-4599
VL - 19
SP - S30-S47
JO - International Journal of Spine Surgery
JF - International Journal of Spine Surgery
ER -