ملخص
In this article we examined aspects of negotiation within a persuasion framework. Specifically, we investigated how the provision of arguments that justified the first offer in a negotiation affected the behavior of the parties, namely, how it influenced counteroffers and settlement prices. In a series of 4 experiments and 2 pilot studies, we demonstrated that when the generation of counterarguments was easy, negotiators who did not add arguments to their first offers achieved superior results compared with negotiators who used arguments to justify their first offer. We hypothesized and provided evidence that adding arguments to a first offer was likely to cause the responding party to search for counterarguments, and this, in turn, led him or her to present counteroffers that were further away from the first offer.
| اللغة الأصلية | الإنجليزيّة |
|---|---|
| الصفحات (من إلى) | 245-255 |
| عدد الصفحات | 11 |
| دورية | Journal of Personality and Social Psychology |
| مستوى الصوت | 101 |
| رقم الإصدار | 2 |
| المعرِّفات الرقمية للأشياء | |
| حالة النشر | نُشِر - أغسطس 2011 |
| منشور خارجيًا | نعم |
بصمة
أدرس بدقة موضوعات البحث “Negotiation as a Form of Persuasion: Arguments in First Offers'. فهما يشكلان معًا بصمة فريدة.قم بذكر هذا
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver