تخطي إلى التنقل الرئيسي تخطي إلى البحث تخطي إلى المحتوى الرئيسي

Lidocaine-prilocaine cream versus tetracaine gel for procedural pain in children

  • Anna Taddio
  • , Mona G.Y. Gurguis
  • , Gideon Koren
  • , Juan F. Feliu
  • , Sylvie Robert

نتاج البحث: نشر في مجلةمقالةمراجعة النظراء

55 اقتباسات (Scopus)

ملخص

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative efficacy of lidocaine-prilocaine and tetracaine for procedural pain in children. METHODS: Systematic review was performed (MEDLINE 1990-June 2001) of all studies comparing the efficacy of these 2 modalities of pain relief in children undergoing painful cutaneous procedures. Search terms included lidocaine, prilocaine, tetracaine, and anesthesia. RESULTS: Eight studies compared lidocaine-prilocaine with tetracaine in children for 4 different procedures: intravenous cannulation, venipuncture, Port-a-Cath puncture, and laser therapy. When used as labeled (60 min for lidocaine-prilocaine, 30 min for tetracaine), the 2 modalities provided similar analgesic efficacy. When both anesthetics were applied for a similar duration of time (40 min, 60 min, 2 h), tetracaine provided superior anesthesia. Tetracaine was commonly associated with erythema, and lidocaine-prilocaine was associated with blanching of the skin. CONCLUSIONS: Lidocaine-prilocaine and tetracaine appear to be comparable for procedural pain relief when used as recommended. Tetracaine is more efficacious than lidocaine-prilocaine when both anesthetics are applied for the same amount of time.

اللغة الأصليةالإنجليزيّة
الصفحات (من إلى)687-692
عدد الصفحات6
دوريةAnnals of Pharmacotherapy
مستوى الصوت36
رقم الإصدار4
المعرِّفات الرقمية للأشياء
حالة النشرنُشِر - 2002
منشور خارجيًانعم

بصمة

أدرس بدقة موضوعات البحث “Lidocaine-prilocaine cream versus tetracaine gel for procedural pain in children'. فهما يشكلان معًا بصمة فريدة.

قم بذكر هذا