ملخص
Background: Current guidelines are inconclusive regarding intravenous (IV) iron for treatment of chemotherapy-induced anaemia (CIA). Material and methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing IV iron with no iron or oral iron for treatment of chemotherapy induced anaemia (CIA). Primary outcomes: haematopoietic response and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirements. For dichotomous data, relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated and pooled. For continuous data, weighted mean differences were calculated. Results: Eleven trials included 1681 patients, the majority examining the addition of IV iron to erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA) (1562 patients, 92.9%). IV iron significantly increased haematopoietic response rate [RR 1.28 (95% CI 1.125-1.45), seven trials with ESA] and decreased the rate of blood transfusions both in trials with ESA [RR 0.76 (95% CI 0.61-0.95), seven trials] and without ESA [RR 0.52 (95% CI 0.34-0.80)]. The increase in haematopoietic response rate correlated with total IV iron dose, regardless of baseline iron status. Mortality and safety profile was comparable between groups. Conclusions: IV iron added to ESA results in an increase in haematopoietic response and reduction in the need for RBC transfusions, with no difference in mortality or adverse events.
| اللغة الأصلية | الإنجليزيّة |
|---|---|
| الصفحات (من إلى) | 18-29 |
| عدد الصفحات | 12 |
| دورية | Acta Oncologica |
| مستوى الصوت | 52 |
| رقم الإصدار | 1 |
| المعرِّفات الرقمية للأشياء | |
| حالة النشر | نُشِر - يناير 2013 |
| منشور خارجيًا | نعم |
بصمة
أدرس بدقة موضوعات البحث “Intravenous iron supplementation for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anaemia - Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials'. فهما يشكلان معًا بصمة فريدة.قم بذكر هذا
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver