TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of antisocial behaviour on opponent's anger, attention, and performance
AU - Ring, Christopher
AU - Kavussanu, Maria
AU - Al-Yaaribi, Ali
AU - Tenenbaum, Gershon
AU - Stanger, Nicholas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2019/4/18
Y1 - 2019/4/18
N2 - Sledging, which is verbal antisocial behaviour in sport, aims to impair an opponent’s performance. Previously, variations in performance have been attributed to changes in emotion and cognition. To improve our understanding of sledging, the current experiment examined the effects of verbal antisocial behaviour on anger, attention and performance. Participants performed a competitive basketball free-throw shooting task under insult (verbal behaviour designed to offend and upset the performer), distraction (verbal behaviour designed to draw attention away from the task), or control (neutral verbal behaviour) conditions. Performance was assessed by the number of successful baskets and a points-based scoring system, while anger and attention were measured post-task. The insult condition provoked more anger than the control and distraction conditions, whereas the insult and distraction conditions increased distraction and reduced self-focus compared to the control condition. Although verbal antisocial behaviour had no overall direct effect on performance, mediation analysis showed that anger indirectly impaired performance via distraction. Implications for the antisocial behaviour-performance relationship are discussed.
AB - Sledging, which is verbal antisocial behaviour in sport, aims to impair an opponent’s performance. Previously, variations in performance have been attributed to changes in emotion and cognition. To improve our understanding of sledging, the current experiment examined the effects of verbal antisocial behaviour on anger, attention and performance. Participants performed a competitive basketball free-throw shooting task under insult (verbal behaviour designed to offend and upset the performer), distraction (verbal behaviour designed to draw attention away from the task), or control (neutral verbal behaviour) conditions. Performance was assessed by the number of successful baskets and a points-based scoring system, while anger and attention were measured post-task. The insult condition provoked more anger than the control and distraction conditions, whereas the insult and distraction conditions increased distraction and reduced self-focus compared to the control condition. Although verbal antisocial behaviour had no overall direct effect on performance, mediation analysis showed that anger indirectly impaired performance via distraction. Implications for the antisocial behaviour-performance relationship are discussed.
KW - Antisocial behaviour
KW - cheating
KW - emotion
KW - performance
KW - sledging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055709266&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02640414.2018.1532061
DO - 10.1080/02640414.2018.1532061
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 30371145
AN - SCOPUS:85055709266
SN - 0264-0414
VL - 37
SP - 871
EP - 877
JO - Journal of Sports Sciences
JF - Journal of Sports Sciences
IS - 8
ER -