TY - CHAP
T1 - Cultural Aspects in Assessing Malingering Detection
AU - Braw, Yoram
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021.
PY - 2021/1/1
Y1 - 2021/1/1
N2 - The effects of cross-cultural factors on cognitive testing have attracted increasing attention in recent years. Studies have indicated that these factors influence examinees’ performance in standard cognitive tests, raising concerns that they may bias decisions regarding whether malingering is at play. The current chapter briefly reviews the effects of cultural factors on performance in cognitive tests as well as the current understanding regarding their sources. Next, effects of cross-cultural factors on the determination of malingering are reviewed, focusing on stand-alone and embedded validity indicators. Though findings suggest that stand-alone validity indicators are relatively immune to these effects, embedded validity indicators necessitate a more cautious approach. However, at present conclusions can be stated only tentatively, as empirical data is still limited. Taking these caveats into consideration, recommendations are suggested to improve the validity of malingering assessment in a cross-cultural context, including a proposal for an interpretative scheme that can be utilized in such assessments. Hopefully, as empirical data accumulates, these recommendations will provide a basis for future refinements.
AB - The effects of cross-cultural factors on cognitive testing have attracted increasing attention in recent years. Studies have indicated that these factors influence examinees’ performance in standard cognitive tests, raising concerns that they may bias decisions regarding whether malingering is at play. The current chapter briefly reviews the effects of cultural factors on performance in cognitive tests as well as the current understanding regarding their sources. Next, effects of cross-cultural factors on the determination of malingering are reviewed, focusing on stand-alone and embedded validity indicators. Though findings suggest that stand-alone validity indicators are relatively immune to these effects, embedded validity indicators necessitate a more cautious approach. However, at present conclusions can be stated only tentatively, as empirical data is still limited. Taking these caveats into consideration, recommendations are suggested to improve the validity of malingering assessment in a cross-cultural context, including a proposal for an interpretative scheme that can be utilized in such assessments. Hopefully, as empirical data accumulates, these recommendations will provide a basis for future refinements.
KW - Arabic
KW - Case study
KW - Cross-cultural
KW - Cultural competence
KW - Ethnicity
KW - Feigned cognitive impairment
KW - Language
KW - Malingering
KW - Neuropsychological assessment
KW - Performance validity tests (PVTs)
KW - Review
KW - Test adaptation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129893571&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-54656-4_3
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-54656-4_3
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontobookanthology.chapter???
AN - SCOPUS:85129893571
SN - 9783030546557
SP - 177
EP - 200
BT - Detection of Malingering during Head Injury Litigation, Third Edition
ER -